Choose Anker 715 Nano II if you mainly charge one USB-C device. Choose Anker 735 Nano II if you need extra ports and your laptop can work with the reduced power available while other devices are connected. Both advertise 65W, but that number does not mean three simultaneous 65W outputs.
This guide compares 715 Nano II 65W, A2663, with 735 Nano II 65W, A2667. Manufacturer information was checked on October 5, 2026. We have not measured charging speed, temperature or efficiency. This article contains purchase links; SEFP Journal may receive a commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links, without an additional charge to you.
Check the model before comparing prices
Anker’s US 715 page identifies A2663. The US 735 Nano II page identifies A2667. Japan sells A2667 as PowerPort III 3-Port 65W Pod. By contrast, 735 GaNPrime 65W is A2668, a different product. Do not transfer the power table below to it. Match the model printed on the charger and listing, plus the plug intended for your country.
| Buying check | 715 Nano II: A2663 | 735 Nano II: A2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | One USB-C | Two USB-C and one USB-A |
| One USB-C port in use | Up to 65W | Up to 65W on either USB-C port |
| Two USB-C devices | Cannot connect both directly | C1 up to 45W; C2 up to 20W |
| Main limitation | Charge devices one at a time | Power changes with the port combination |
| Useful purchase scenario | A dedicated laptop or phone charger | A laptop and phone that fit the shared budget |
The Japanese A2663 specification lists approximately 112g and 44 × 42 × 36mm; its A2667 counterpart lists approximately 130g and 38 × 29 × 66mm. These are Japanese product figures, not measurements of every regional plug. Check your local listing rather than assuming the overseas version has identical dimensions.
How the 735 Nano II shares power
The official A2667 manual documents these combinations. C1 is the upper USB-C port and C2 is the lower one in Anker’s port diagram. The figures are output ceilings, not a promise that your devices will draw them.
| Connected ports | Maximum allocation | Decision to make |
|---|---|---|
| C1 or C2 alone | 65W | Use one port if your laptop needs the full rated output |
| USB-A alone | 22.5W | Check the device’s charging protocol |
| C1 + C2 | 45W + 20W | Put the laptop on C1 |
| C1 + USB-A | 40W + 22.5W | Allow for a lower laptop ceiling |
| C2 + USB-A | 12W + 12W | This pair is not the 45W + 20W arrangement |
| C1 + C2 + USB-A | 40W + 12W + 12W | Neither secondary port retains its single-port maximum |
For example, if your laptop’s manufacturer requires a 65W supply for your workload, 45W plus a phone is not an equivalent replacement. Check the laptop’s accepted USB Power Delivery profiles and recommended adapter rating. Whether a lower-power supply can maintain its battery during your work remains device dependent. If you need a full 65W laptop supply alongside phone charging, consider separate chargers or another model with an explicitly sufficient simultaneous allocation.
Cables and fast-charging labels need a separate check
The A2663 manual recommends an original or appropriately certified cable; the A2667 manual gives the same guidance. Both US product pages say cables are sold separately. Budget for the cables your devices require: USB-C to USB-C for USB-C devices, or USB-C to Lightning for a Lightning iPhone.
For Samsung buyers, both US pages explicitly say they support S22 Ultra Super Fast Charging but not its 45W Super Fast Charging 2.0. A charger marked 65W therefore is not automatically a 45W Samsung charger. The 715 page also recommends the original or a 5A E-marker cable for the S22 series. Verify your exact phone’s requirements; these statements do not establish a maximum charging speed for every Galaxy or Pixel model.
Who should buy each charger?
- 715: you charge one device at a time, already own the right cable, and want a dedicated USB-C supply. Its disadvantage is having to swap devices or carry a second charger.
- 735 Nano II: your laptop and phone fit within the documented shared allocation, or you need a USB-A accessory connection. Its disadvantage is the reduced output as ports are added.
- Neither without more checking: you require a particular phone’s highest proprietary charging mode, a laptop supply above 65W, or full laptop power while charging several devices. A USB-C connector and a headline wattage alone do not establish compatibility.
FAQ: can I add ports later, and which listing should I buy?
Can a cable turn the 715 into the 735? These are different charger bodies. Do not treat a passive splitter as an equivalent three-port power-management upgrade. Choose the port arrangement you actually need.
Does the 735 always charge the laptop faster? No speed comparison was measured here. With one USB-C device each has a listed 65W ceiling; with multiple devices the 735 uses the lower allocations above. The device, cable and charging state also matter.
Where should I check the complete cost? Compare the 715 official US listing and 735 Nano II official US listing, then confirm your regional plug, model, cables, taxes, delivery and returns. Prices and availability change; no cross-region price or stock guarantee is made. If you are also choosing a tablet, see our Galaxy Tab A11+ vs Redmi Pad 2 guide for device-side charging and accessory checks.
Sources linked above are manufacturer product pages and model-specific manuals, checked October 5, 2026. Recommendations are deductions from those published conditions, not hands-on test results. Unverified items include actual charging times, heat under load, the power accepted by your own devices, and regional checkout totals.
